The Global Think Tank - Click here to learn more...

Lebanon on the Margins of the Arab Spring

Mohamad Chatah, Marwan Muasher Friday, February 3, 2012 – Washington, D.C.

One year after the beginning of the Arab Spring, Lebanon reflects on its own popular protests seven years ago, when Prime Minister Rafik Hariri’s assassination unleashed the Cedar Revolution. Ambassador Mohamad Chatah, who has served in a number of governmental and advisory positions in the Lebanese government, discussed the implications of the Arab uprisings for Lebanon’s future. Carnegie’s Marwan Muasher moderated the conversation.

Reflecting on the Region’s Revolutions

  • The Arab Spring: The Arab Spring isn’t a tsunami that comes and goes, but rather a complete process of transformation, argued Chatah. It is not a nationalist movement or an Islamist one, but rather, a call for basic universal principles. Chatah expressed confidence in this process of change, adding that democracy will bring better policies, which will, in turn, improve the standard of living.
     
  • Lebanon’s Own Revolution: The goal of the March 14 Alliance was forcing the Syrian army out of Lebanon. But on a general level, Chatah said, the Lebanese people were also seeking good governance after 15 years of internal warfare and 15 years of external control.

Political Islam and Hezbollah

  • Political Islam in the Region: Chatah stated it is natural for political Islam to gain strength and popularity after it had been choked by dictators so harshly. Ultimately, though, he believed that once Muslim societies are given the space to breathe, they will govern “normally.”
     
  • A Democratic Nature of Islam: Chatah agreed that while many in the West misunderstand Islam, other religions have been misconstrued as well. He stated that Islam is one of the only religions that talks about a consultative government and other democratic principles, but acknowledged that people can find ways to use religion to support a wide variety of positions. Ultimately, he said, if people want Islam to be democratic, it can be done.
     
  • Christian Fear: Chatah attributed the fear that political Islam strikes in the region’s Christian population to the significant amount of anti-political Islam propaganda that has been present since about 2005. Other factors provoking this fear in Lebanon include former Prime Minister Michel Aoun’s convenient alliance with Hezbollah and rumors regarding March 14th’s alleged ties to Saudi Arabia, he added.
     
  • Hezbollah’s Persistence: While some Lebanese argue that Hezbollah has done wonderful things in standing up to Israel, Chatah suggested that Hezbollah’s insistence on remaining an independent entity regardless of the Israeli occupation of Lebanon is particularly problematic. Hezbollah has changed the balance of power. Lebanon cannot have a separate military organization independent of the will of the people, argued Chatah.
     
  • Incorporating Hezbollah: Chatah stated that when the Syrian regime does fall, he does not expect Hezbollah to change right away. He contended that incorporating Hezbollah into the Lebanese army would be the most reasonable course of action to promote stability in Lebanon; this could be accomplished through a change of state policy on Palestine, among other things.

Reform and the Challenges Ahead

  • Taif Agreement: Chatah argued that the political system in Lebanon needs reform. Although the Taif Agreement established important principles about representation and equality, diminishing the sectarian and ethnic divisions that could otherwise paralyze the country, there is a need, at some point, to go beyond the confines of the Lebanese National Contract.
     
  • The Need for a Senate: Chatah emphasized the importance of a Senate where all communities get representation. He suggested that trying to achieve equal representation through the existing parliament will be unsuccessful.
     
  • Challenges Ahead: Chatah recognized that many difficulties lie ahead. The economics of democracy and the issue of Palestine are two issues which must be approached creatively and must be resolved strategically, he said. He added that it is wrong to think that Palestine is no longer an issue for the Arab people, even if they currently seem focused on more local issues.
     
 
Source: www.carnegieendowment.org/events/?fa=eventDetail&id=3528
Featured Publication
The Daily Star, December 6, 2011

Lebanon Needs a Public Debt Strategy

Lebanon faces enormous public debt without any clear exit strategy. The country should consider new methods it can employ to restructure its debt now.

More Related Publications...
Related Events
 

Carnegie Resources

Quotes on Carnegie - Praise for the Global Think Tank
“[Carnegie is]…one of the centers of gravity of thinking about national security matters in our country.” – General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
“Carnegie remains a first-rate source of policy analysis and practical guidance on all the major international issues and I rely on the advice and counsel of many Carnegie scholars.” – John McCain, U.S. Senator
“The Carnegie Endowment has been a training ground for many of the all-stars in the State Department….” – Madeleine Albright, Former Secretary of State
“I appreciate its work in the area of peace.” – Kofi Annan, Former Secretary-General of the United Nations
“I cannot think of a better alignment of communication, information, and getting people together.” – Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Google
“The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is the #3 think tank in the world.” University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings
“[T]his great vision of becoming a global think tank [is] badly needed in an interconnected world.” – Nicholas Burns, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs
“One of the most globally trusted talking-shops.” The Economist
“The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is the #3 think tank in the United States.” University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings
“It is truly a global think tank…completely and appropriately reflective of the nature of the challenges that we face today.” – John Kerry, U.S. Senator
“A force for global peace and security for 100 years.” – John Brennan, Homeland Security Advisor
“An excellent institution that does important work to help establish stronger international laws and organizations.” – His Royal Highness Prince Turki Al-Faisal
“The Carnegie Moscow Center is the top think tank in Central and Eastern Europe.” University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings
“The Carnegie Endowment…has for a century been dedicated to understanding and preventing war and its myriad causes.” – Robert Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense
“The Carnegie Endowment is known on both sides of the aisle with great deal of respect for your active international engagement….” – Michael Turner, U.S. Congressman
“[This event is]… a testament to the success that you’ve had in transforming Carnegie… into a truly global think tank.” – Leon Panetta, U.S. Secretary of Defense
“The Carnegie Middle East Center is the top think tank in the Middle East and North Africa.” University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings

From Carnegie's Global Network

Syrian Regime Cannot Conceal An Economy in Rapid Decline

Ibrahim Saif
Tuesday, May 22, 2012

No one is fully knowledgeable about the state of the Syrian economy, how exactly it has been affected by the events taking place in the country, or how to interpret the choice economic indicators issued by Syrian officials.

Future Challenges for U.S.-China Relations

Michael D. Swaine, Yan Xuetong, Paul Haenle, John Pomfret, Yuan Peng
Tuesday, April 17, 2012

The U.S. pivot to the Asia-Pacific has created both tension and opportunity in its relations with China.

Saving the Euro without Losing the Europeans

Stefan Lehne
Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Eurozone; Euro Crisis The gap between the efforts to deepen integration in order to save the euro and what most people really think should happen is wider than it has ever been before.

Why I'm Optimistic About Putin's 4th Term

Nikolay Petrov
Monday, May 21, 2012

The Russian political system is likely to undergo some changes this year, perhaps even serious ones — not because Putin wants them, but because elements of Putin's inner circle are convinced that the government must take some of the protesters' demands seriously.

Connect with Carnegie

Stay in the Know

Sign up for Carnegie announcements and publications—including Carnegie This Week—by filling out the form below. Note—fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

Personal Information
 
 
 
1779 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840