The Global Think Tank - Click here to learn more...

How Italy Will Change

Uri Dadush L’Espresso, February 10, 2012 Comments

Italy and the Euro crisis As Italians confront their most dangerous economic crisis, they fear for their future and their children’s. How will Italy need to change if this fear, which paralyzes economic activity, is to be overcome?

Based on the experience of other crisis countries thus far, Italians’ fear is justified by facts. Italian unemployment is up by forty percent since the crisis erupted, but the unemployment rate in Greece, Ireland, and Spain, where the adjustment is still far from over, has already doubled or tripled. Domestic demand in Italy is down five percent since its peak in 2007, but it has already fallen by between ten percent and twenty-five percent in the other crisis countries.

Do these comparisons apply? No one can know exactly. It is true that Italy has a smaller fiscal deficit and its banks are in better shape than any of these problem countries, but Italy has a high debt, has lost competitiveness and the capacity to grow, and, moreover, is in a much earlier phase of its adjustment.

So, let me be clear: Europe needs to help, but even with help, Italy faces big changes and, assuming all goes well, two or three difficult years lie ahead. The relevant question is how the inevitable hardship can be mitigated in impact and duration.

Everyone knows that Italy must restore its fiscal balance and reestablish growth. Achieving fiscal balance is tough, but reigniting growth in austerity and without devaluing is even tougher. In fact, it cannot be done quickly and a recession this year appears inevitable. However, given time, productivity can be boosted, resources can shift from the sclerotic public to the private sector, and from the moribund domestic sector—such as services and construction—to the traded sector, towards the world’s most dynamic sources of demand, especially to emerging markets. So Italy needs to step up its investment in machinery, tourism, design, other exportable services, and in food processing and agriculture. A big part of the difference between a dynamic Germany and a stagnant Italy is that the former’s share of exports in GDP has increased by seventeen percentage points of GDP since 2000, while the share of Italy’s exports in GDP has increased by just two percentage points.

How does one make sure these needed changes occur as rapidly as possible and in a way that minimizes the pain? Experience in both advanced and developing countries points to the following four lessons:

  • Fiscal adjustment is less damaging to growth if it relies more heavily on expenditure cuts and elimination of waste than on tax increases which reduce everyone’s incentives to invest and to work.
     
  • Taxpayers must share the burden equally, so tax evaders must be pursued vigorously while the poor must be sheltered.
  • Employers in declining sectors must be allowed to downsize, while those in expanding sector should not be deterred from investing because of fear that they will be stuck with the workers they hire. The burden of adjustment should not fall disproportionally on young or older workers, or on those with temporary or precarious work arrangements. Wage moderation and shorter working hours will increase the likelihood that workers stay employed.
     
  • Firms must compete, allowing prices faced by citizens and other firms to decline, moderating the fall in living standards and enhancing international competitiveness.

There is a connecting thread across these lessons—they entail reforms that are intrinsically equitable—favoring the people instead of specific groups.

For precisely these reasons, the reforms are already and will be increasingly resisted by special interests of all stripes—government agencies, firms, unions, and professions—who all benefit from the currently uncompetitive and inequitable system. So, expect Italy’s highly respected new government to come under more intense attack from multiple directions as the adjustment takes place. The political opposition meanwhile will bide its time.

Italy’s success will ultimately depend on whether its citizens—who know that there is no serious alternative to the current course—make their voices heard. They will be the drivers of Italy’s change.

This article was originally published in Italian in L'Espresso.

 

Comments

 
  • Report Abuse
Resources available for this publication
Source: www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=47153
Featured Event
Monday, February 6, 2012 Washington, D.C.

IMF Chief Economist Olivier Blanchard on the Global Economy in 2012

2012 has the markings of a difficult year. The future of the euro is inscrutable and Europe is likely already in recession. Growth is slowing in the major emerging economies, and the recovery in the United States remains slow and fragile.

More Related Events
Related Publications
 

Carnegie Resources

Quotes on Carnegie - Praise for the Global Think Tank
“[Carnegie is]…one of the centers of gravity of thinking about national security matters in our country.” – General Martin Dempsey, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
“Carnegie remains a first-rate source of policy analysis and practical guidance on all the major international issues and I rely on the advice and counsel of many Carnegie scholars.” – John McCain, U.S. Senator
“The Carnegie Endowment has been a training ground for many of the all-stars in the State Department….” – Madeleine Albright, Former Secretary of State
“I appreciate its work in the area of peace.” – Kofi Annan, Former Secretary-General of the United Nations
“I cannot think of a better alignment of communication, information, and getting people together.” – Eric Schmidt, Executive Chairman of Google
“The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is the #3 think tank in the world.” University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings
“[T]his great vision of becoming a global think tank [is] badly needed in an interconnected world.” – Nicholas Burns, Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs
“One of the most globally trusted talking-shops.” The Economist
“The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace is the #3 think tank in the United States.” University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings
“It is truly a global think tank…completely and appropriately reflective of the nature of the challenges that we face today.” – John Kerry, U.S. Senator
“A force for global peace and security for 100 years.” – John Brennan, Homeland Security Advisor
“An excellent institution that does important work to help establish stronger international laws and organizations.” – His Royal Highness Prince Turki Al-Faisal
“The Carnegie Moscow Center is the top think tank in Central and Eastern Europe.” University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings
“The Carnegie Endowment…has for a century been dedicated to understanding and preventing war and its myriad causes.” – Robert Gates, U.S. Secretary of Defense
“The Carnegie Endowment is known on both sides of the aisle with great deal of respect for your active international engagement….” – Michael Turner, U.S. Congressman
“[This event is]… a testament to the success that you’ve had in transforming Carnegie… into a truly global think tank.” – Leon Panetta, U.S. Secretary of Defense
“The Carnegie Middle East Center is the top think tank in the Middle East and North Africa.” University of Pennsylvania 2011 Global Think Tank Rankings

From Carnegie's Global Network

Syrian Regime Cannot Conceal An Economy in Rapid Decline

Ibrahim Saif
Tuesday, May 22, 2012

No one is fully knowledgeable about the state of the Syrian economy, how exactly it has been affected by the events taking place in the country, or how to interpret the choice economic indicators issued by Syrian officials.

Future Challenges for U.S.-China Relations

Michael D. Swaine, Yan Xuetong, Paul Haenle, John Pomfret, Yuan Peng
Tuesday, April 17, 2012

The U.S. pivot to the Asia-Pacific has created both tension and opportunity in its relations with China.

Saving the Euro without Losing the Europeans

Stefan Lehne
Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Eurozone; Euro Crisis The gap between the efforts to deepen integration in order to save the euro and what most people really think should happen is wider than it has ever been before.

Why I'm Optimistic About Putin's 4th Term

Nikolay Petrov
Monday, May 21, 2012

The Russian political system is likely to undergo some changes this year, perhaps even serious ones — not because Putin wants them, but because elements of Putin's inner circle are convinced that the government must take some of the protesters' demands seriously.

Connect with Carnegie

Stay in the Know

Sign up for Carnegie announcements and publications—including Carnegie This Week—by filling out the form below. Note—fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.

Personal Information
 
 
 
1779 Massachusetts Ave. NW Washington, DC 20036-2103 Phone: 202 483 7600 Fax: 202 483 1840