|
|
This table represents the Carnegie
Non-Proliferation Projects best assessment of the world's ballistic
missile arsenals.
The Project counts 35 nations as fielding some type of ballistic missile. Missiles
reported to be in development are listed in italics.
Endnotes and a key are provided below.
1
|
COUNTRY |
SYSTEM NAME |
STATUS |
RANGE (KM) |
PAYLOAD (KG) |
ORIGIN |
NOTES |
|
Afghanistan |
Scud-B |
O |
300 |
1,000 |
USSR |
Operational status questionable. |
|
Argentina |
Alacran |
O |
150 |
400 |
Domestic |
|
|
Armenia 2 |
Scud-B |
O |
300 |
1,000 |
Russia |
|
|
Azerbaijan |
Scud-B |
O |
300 |
1,000 |
USSR |
|
|
Bahrain |
MGM-140 |
P |
165 |
560 |
USA |
|
|
Belarus |
SS-21 |
O |
120 |
480 |
USSR |
|
|
Scud-B |
O |
300 |
1,000 |
USSR |
|
|
|
Bulgaria 3 |
Scud-B |
O |
300 |
1,000 |
USSR |
|
|
SS-23 |
O |
500 |
450 |
USSR |
Prohibited by INF Treaty. 4 |
|
|
China |
CSS-8 |
O
|
230
|
I
|
Two stage, first solid, second liquid. Road-mobile. | |
| CSS-X-7 |
O
|
300
|
500
|
I
|
Solid fuelled. Road-mobile. | |
| CSS-6 |
O
|
600
|
500
|
I
|
Solid fuelled. Road-mobile. | |
| For China's other ballistic missiles, visit China's Nuclear Numbers. | ||||||
|
Congo |
Scud-B |
O? |
300 |
1,000 |
Iran |
According to press reports. 5 |
|
Egypt |
Scud-B |
O/U |
300 |
1,000 |
USSR/DPRK |
|
|
Project T |
O |
450 |
1,000 |
I/DPRK |
Improved Scud. |
|
|
Scud-C |
O |
500 |
600 |
DPRK |
|
|
|
Vector |
D |
685 |
? |
I/DPRK |
Initial project (with Argentina, Iraq) by this name terminated. Some work continues with North Korea? | |
|
France |
For France's ballistic missiles, visit France's Nuclear Numbers. | |||||
|
Georgia |
Scud-B |
O |
300 |
1,000 |
USSR |
|
|
Greece |
MGM-140 (ATACMS) |
O |
165 |
560 |
USA |
|
|
India |
Prithvi-150 |
O |
150 |
1,000 |
I/USSR |
From Russian SA-2. Army missile. Tested on March 26, 2003 on the same day as Pakistan tested Abdali missile system. 29 Last tested on April 29, 2003 from a site in eastern Orissa state. A defense ministry spokesman deemed it successful. This version of the missile has "the latest on-board computer and navigation system and can use both solid and liquid propellant." 31 |
|
Prithvi-250 |
O |
250 |
500 |
I/USSR |
From Russian SA-2. Air Force missile. |
|
|
Dhanush |
D/O? |
250 |
500 |
I |
From Prithvi. Last tested September 2001. India says it will soon be "operationalized" 6 |
|
| Bramhos |
D?
|
300?
|
225?
|
I/Russia
|
Launched from either ships or aircraft. | |
|
Sagarika 7 |
D? |
250-350? |
500? |
I |
From Prithvi. |
|
|
Prithvi-350 |
D |
350 |
500 |
I/USSR |
From Russian SA-2. |
|
|
Agni-I |
T |
600-750 |
1,000 |
I/US/France |
From Scout; tested 18 February 1994. Tested on January 25 2002. Last tested on January
9, 2003. |
|
|
Agni-II |
O/P |
2,000/2,500 |
1,000 |
I/US/France |
Last tested January 2001; India says missile limited production has begun 8 |
|
|
Agni-III |
D
|
3,000
|
?
|
I
|
||
|
Surya 9 |
D? |
3250+? |
? |
I |
From Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle and Agni-2. |
|
|
COUNTRY |
SYSTEM NAME |
STATUS |
RANGE (KM) |
PAYLOAD (KG) |
ORIGIN |
NOTES |
|
Iran
10
|
M-7 (CSS-8) |
O |
150 |
190 |
PRC |
Modified SA-2. |
|
Scud-B |
O/U |
300 |
1,000 |
N.Korea/Domestic production |
|
|
|
Scud-C |
O |
500 |
600 -700 |
DPRK |
|
|
|
Shahab III |
T /D? |
1,300 |
800-1000? |
I/DPRK/Russia |
From Nodong. U.S. intelligence says Iran has a "small number ... available for use in a conflict." Tested in May 2002. 24 Failed test in July 2002. 25 Successfully tested in July 2003. This test was the first of eight tests to successfully achieve the range of 1300km. Israeli intelligence indicated that the missile was powered by a North Korean liquid-fuel engine. 32
|
|
|
Shahab IV |
D |
2,000 |
? |
I/Russia |
From Russian SS-4? |
|
|
Shahab V 11 |
D? |
3,000-5,500? |
? |
I/Russia |
|
|
|
Iraq |
Al Samoud |
D |
150 |
200 |
I |
Liquid-fuel missile. From Scud B. 12 |
| Ababil-100 |
D |
150 |
200 |
I |
Solid-fuel missile from Scud B. |
|
|
Al Hussein |
Hidden? |
650 |
500 |
I |
From Scud B. |
|
|
Israel |
Lance |
O/S |
130 |
450 |
US |
|
|
Jericho I |
O |
500 |
1,000 |
France |
Road-mobile. |
|
|
Jericho II |
O |
1,500 |
1,000 |
France/I |
Road-mobile. |
|
|
Jericho III |
D |
2,500 |
1,000? |
I |
|
|
|
Kazakhstan |
Scud-B |
O
|
300
|
1,000
|
USSR
|
|
|
Tochka-U (modified SS-21) |
O |
120 |
480 |
USSR |
|
|
|
Libya |
Scud-B |
O/U |
300 |
1,000 |
USSR |
Operational status questionable. |
|
Al Fatah 13 |
D/T |
950? |
500 |
I/? |
|
|
|
North Korea |
Scud-B |
O/P |
300 |
1,000 |
USSR |
|
|
Scud-C Variant |
O/P |
500 |
600-700 |
I |
|
|
|
Nodong |
D/T |
1,300 |
700-1,000 |
I |
Single-stage, liquid fuel missile. Tested May 1993. |
|
|
Taepodong I |
T |
1,500-2,000 |
1,000 |
I |
Combined Nodong and Scud; tested 31 August 1998. 14 |
|
|
Taepodong II |
D |
3,500-5,500 |
1,000 |
I |
|
|
|
Pakistan |
Hatf I |
O |
80 |
500 |
I |
|
|
Hatf II/Abdali 15 |
O |
180 |
500 |
I/PRC? |
First test-fired in 2002. Last tested on March 26, 2002 on the same day as India's Prithvi test. 30 |
|
|
Hatf III /Ghaznavi/M-11 |
O |
290 |
500 |
I/PRC |
2001 NIE lists the Hatf III to be an M-11. May 2002 test revealed a 280 km range. Tested on October 3, 2003. |
|
|
Shaheen I |
P/O |
700/750 |
500 |
I/PRC? |
M-9 derivative? Tested April 1999. Solid fuel missile. Pakistan announced "serial production" of missile October 2000. Tested again in October 2002. 23 Tested on October 7, 2003. |
|
|
Ghauri I/Hatf V/Nodong |
O |
1,300 |
500-750 |
I/DPRK |
2001 NIE lists the Ghauri to be a Nodong; tested 6 April 1998. 16 Last tested May 2002 January 8, 2003 Handed over to Pakistan's army from research facility. 28 |
|
|
Ghauri II |
D/T |
2,000? |
700 |
I/DPRK |
From Nodong; tested April 1999. |
|
|
Shaheen II 17 |
D/P |
2,000/2,500 |
1,000? |
I/DPRK? |
Road mobile, two-stage weapon displayed in March 2000 parade. |
|
|
Ghauri III |
D/T |
2,700-3,500 |
? |
I/DPRK |
Engines tested 23 July 1999 and 29 September 1999. 18 |
|
COUNTRY |
SYSTEM NAME |
STATUS |
RANGE (KM) |
PAYLOAD (KG) |
ORIGIN |
NOTES |
| Russia |
Scud B (SS-1c Mod 1) |
O
|
300
|
1,000
|
I
|
Liquid fuel. |
| SS-21 |
O
|
100-120
|
I
|
Solid fuel. | ||
| SS-X-26 |
O
|
300
|
I
|
Solid fuel. | ||
| Iskander-E |
O
|
275
|
I
|
For export. Solid fuel. | ||
| For Russia's nuclear-capable ballistic missiles, visit Russia's Nuclear Numbers. | ||||||
|
Saudi Arabia |
Dong Feng-3 |
O |
2,600 |
2,150
|
PRC |
Purchased from China in 1987. |
|
Slovakia |
SS-21 |
O
|
100-120
|
480
|
USSR
|
|
| Scud B |
O
|
300
|
1,000
|
USSR
|
|
|
|
South Korea |
Nike-Hercules-1 |
O |
180 |
300 |
US/I |
Modified SAM. |
| Nike-Hercules-2 |
D
|
250
|
500
|
US/I
|
Modified SAM; Tested at reduced range. | |
| MGM-140 (ATACMS) |
O |
165/300
|
560
|
US
|
Currently fields Block I. Contract for Block IA sale approved, will receive full shipment in 2004. | |
|
? |
D/T |
300 |
500 |
I |
This yet unnamed missile was tested on November 22, 2001. 19 |
|
|
Syria |
SS-21 |
O |
120 |
480 |
USSR |
Transferred 1983. |
|
Scud-B |
O |
300 |
1,000 |
USSR |
||
|
Scud-C 20 |
O |
500 |
600 |
DPRK IRAN |
Tested September 2000. Syria prepared to begin production of a new extended version of the Scud-C. With the assembly line for the weapon complete, Syria is expected to be capable of producing 30 missiles annually. 26 |
|
|
Scud-D 21 |
T |
600-700 |
? |
DPRK |
Tested September 2000. |
|
|
Taiwan |
Ching Feng |
O |
130 |
270 |
I/Israel? |
From Lance. |
|
Tien Chi 22 |
D |
300 |
500 |
I |
Modified SAM. |
|
|
Turkey |
MGM-140 (ATACMS) |
O |
165 |
560 |
USA |
|
|
Turkmenistan |
Scud-B |
O |
300 |
1,000 |
USSR |
|
|
Ukraine |
SS-21 |
O |
120 |
480 |
USSR |
|
|
Scud-B |
O |
300 |
1,000 |
USSR |
||
|
United Arab Emirates |
Scud-B |
O
|
300
|
1,000
|
Russia?
|
|
| United Kingdom | For the United Kingdom's ballistic missiles, visit United Kingdom Nuclear Numbers. | |||||
| United States | MGM-140 (ATACMS) |
O
|
165
|
560
|
I
|
|
| For the United States' nuclear-capable ballistic missiles, see United States Nuclear Numbers. | ||||||
|
Vietnam |
Scud-B |
O |
300 |
1,000 |
|
|
|
Yemen |
SS-21 |
O |
100-120 |
480 |
USSR |
Transferred 1988. |
|
Scud-B |
O/U
|
300 |
1,000
|
USSR
|
Transferred to South Yemen in 1979. | |
|
Scud |
(unknown) |
|
|
DPRK |
12-15 Scuds intercepted by Spanish Military in the Arabian Sea en route to Yemen from North Korea |
|
|
Status |
|
D: in Development |
|
O: Operational |
|
P: in Production |
|
S: in Storage |
|
T: Tested |
|
U: Used |
|
RANGE |
|
|
SRBM |
Short-range ballistic missile (<1,000 km) |
|
MRBM |
Medium-range ballistic missile (1,000-3,000 km) |
|
IRBM |
Intermediate-range ballistic missile (3,000-5,500 km) |
|
Origin |
|
I: Indigenous |
|
Notes |
|
INF Treaty: Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty |
|
SAM: Surface-to-air missile |
News:
Agni, Prithvi Will be Inducted Soon - Two variants of the Agni group of
ballistic missiles and the IAF and Navy versions of the tactical Prithvi missile
are in the process of being inducted into the armed forces, according to Defense
Secretary George Fernandes. While the Pakistan-specific, 700 to 800-km range
Agni-I and 2,000-km-plus Agni II are now being inducted, officials say India
also plans to test-fire the China-specific, 3,000-km-plus Agni-III by year end.
Additionally, Fernandes said that India had undertaken 20 test flights of seven
types of missiles from January 1 to June 30 of this year. The Times of India,
31 July 2003 .
1. Principle sources for this table include: National
Air Intelligence Center, Ballistic and Cruise Missile Threat (National
Air Intelligence Center, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, September 2000); International
Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), "Ballistic and Cruise Missiles," The
Military Balance 1999-2000 (London: Oxford University Press, 1999), pp. 309-11;
National Intelligence Council, Foreign Missile Developments and the Ballistic
Missile Threat to the United States Through 2015, Unclassified National
Intelligence Estimate, September 1999; US Department of Defense (DOD), Proliferation:
Threat and Response (Washington, DC: GPO, November 1997); Center for Defense
and International Security Studies, "Ballistic
Missile Capabilities by Country,"; and Tracking
Nuclear Proliferation: A Guide in Maps and Charts, 1998 (Washington,
DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1998). Information of China's
missile capabilities also draws on the 1999 Report of the Select Committee on
U.S. National Security and Military/Commercial Concerns with the People's Republic
of China (also known as the "Cox report").
2. Russia is thought to have shipped 8 Scud launchers and 24 missiles to Armenia
between 1992 and 1995. See Nikolai Novichkov, "Russia Details Illegal Deliveries
to Armenia," Jane's Defence Weekly, 16 April 1997, p. 15.
3. Bulgaria and the United States have signed an agreement in May 2002 which
commits Bulgaria to destroy its short- and medium-range missile stockpiles.
The destruction of Soviet-designed SS-23, Scud, and FROGs will be financed through
the U.S. Department of State. "Bulgaria Agrees to U.S. Request to Destroy
Missiles" AFP, 31 May 2002.
4. IISS lists 8 SS-23 launchers in Bulgaria, despite prohibition of SS-23 missiles
by the INF Treaty.
5. Iran reportedly delivered Scud-B and Scud-C missiles to the Democratic Republic
of Congo in November 1999. See "DRC Receives Iranian 'Scud' Missiles," Jane's
Defence Weekly, 1 December 1999, p. 5; and Bill Gertz, "Tehran Sold Scud
Missiles to Congolese," Washington Times, 22 November 1999.
6. The Dhanush is the naval version of the Prithvi series."Dhanush Missile Test-Fired"
Times of India, September 21, 2001
7. The Indian government first acknowledged the existence of the Sagarika in
October 1998, identifying it as a 250-350 kilometer sea-launched cruise missile
derived from the Prithvi. Other sources maintained that the Sagarika program
also contained a ballistic missile division. The intended range and role of
the Dhanush, however, suggest that it may in fact be the new name for the Sagarika
ballistic missile program. See Rahul Bedi, "India Confirms Plans for Improved
Agni and Naval Cruise Missile," Jane's Missiles and Rockets, October
1998; "In Search of the Real Sagarika," Jane's Intelligence Review, July
1998; and T.S. Gopi Rethinaraj, "Navalised Prithvi Causes Confusion," Jane's
Intelligence Review, January 1999.
8. The Agni-2 test missile traveled over 1,250 kilometers in an April 1999 test.
It was successfully tested (apparently in its final configuration) a second
time on 17 January 2001, reportedly to a length of approximately 2,000 kilometers
following its firing from a mobile launcher. It is a road-mobile, two-stage
missile with a "solid propulsion booster and liquid propulsion upper state"
("Agni-II Testfired in Final Configuration," Times of India,
17 January 2001). In a March 7, 2000 letter to Parliament Defense Minister George
Fernandes wrote that the Agni-2 had "achieved operationalization stage ... The
government has decided to induct the missile system based on security needs"
("Indian Missile Set For Production," International Herald Tribune,
8 March 2001). On May 31, 2001, The Times of India reported that the
government approved the induction of the Agni-2 in 2001-2002 and the development
of a longer range missile. In June of 2001, India announced it had begun limited
production of the Agni II and that it would be under the control of the Army
( Rahul Bedi, "Indian Army Will Control Agni II" Jane's Defence Weekly" August
22, 2001, p. 15).
9. Estimates of the range of this new missile vary widely. The National Air
Intelligence Center projects a range of 3250 kilometers, Indian scientists have
claimed the range will exceed 5000 kilometers, and some Western analysts estimate
8,000-12,000 kilometers. See Vivek Raghunvanishi, "India to Develop Extensive
Nuclear Missile Arsenal," Defense News, 24 May 1999; Institute for Foreign
Policy Analysis, Exploring
U.S. Missile Defense Requirements in 2010: What Are the Policy and Technology
Challenges?, April 1997,; and David Tanks, "Ballistic Missiles in South
Asia: Are ICBMs a Future Possibility?" Commission to Assess the Ballistic Missile
Threat to the United States, Appendix III: Unclassified Working Papers.
10. The DOD reported that Iran also produces a 200-km "Zelzal" missile and a
150-km "Nazeat" missile, which may be variations of its "Mushak" series. Iran
has also tried to acquire a complete North Korean Nodong system and the Chinese
M-9 and M-11 missiles.
11. Estimates of the range of this new IRBM are only speculative, drawing upon
remarks by the Iranian Defense Minister, who identified the missile as the "Shahab-5".
Kenneth Timmerman also suggested that Iran might be developing an IRBM (which
he called the "Kosar") on July 13, 1999 during hearings on the Iran Nonproliferation
Act of 1999. See Hearings
of the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics, US House Committee on Science,
; and Bill Gertz, "Tehran Increases Range on Missiles," Washington Times,
22 September 1999.
12. One intelligence report called the Al Samoud a "scaled down Scud." See "Iraq's
Weapons of Mass Destruction Programs," US Government White Paper No. 3050, released
February 17, 1998. While this missile has a range of about 150km (the maximum
range allowed for Iraqi missiles by UN Security Council resolutions), there
are concerns that Iraq continues to devote resources to the Ababil and Al Samoud
programs with the intention of quickly transferring these resources back to
missiles with longer ranges following the end of sanctions. These concerns are
reiterated in the DoD's January 2001 "Proliferation: Threat and Response":
"the Al-Samoud is essentially a scaled-down SCUD ... We believe that the
Al Samoud missile ... has an inherent potential to exceed the 150-km range restriction
imposed under UNSCR 687." The report also registers similar concerns about
the Ababil-100. The 2001 NIE noted that a December 2000 parade showcased the
Al Samoud on new trasnporter-erector-launchers, and that it will, "be deployed
soon."
13. Though intended to have a range of 950 kilometers, the Al Fatah has been
successfully tested to only 200 kilometers. See Department of Defense Proliferation:
Threat and Response 2001, p. 47-48. The CIA's Unclassified Report to
Congress on the Acquisition of Technology Relating to Weapons of Mass Destruction
and Advanced Conventional Munitions, 1 January Through 30 June 2000 notes
that "Libya's current capability remains limited to its aging Scud B missiles,
but with continued foreign assistance it may achieve an MRBM capability-a long-desired
goal." There are unconfirmed reports that Libya has attepmted to purchase
longer range missiles from North Korea (Scud-C and Nodong models have been mentioned).
14. The missile impacted 1,320 kilometers from the launch point. It attempted
and failed to put a small satellite into orbit, demonstrating some progress
in staging technology.
15. The Hatf-2 was once thought to be a variant of the M-11 missiles transferred
by China. The most recent test of this missile in May of 2002 revealed it to
have a significantly shorter range than the M-11. An alternative view supplyed
by one analysis suggests that Pakistan developed the Hatf-2 based on French
sounding rocket engines that it obtained. See S. Chandrashekar, "An Assessment
of Pakistan's Missile Capability," Jane's Strategic Weapon Systems, March
1990, p. 4.
16. Pakistan claimed that the missile impacted 1,100 kilometers from its launch
point. The Ghauri (liquid fuel) and Shaheen (solid fuel) projects are run by
different laboratories.
17. See Atul Aneja, "Pakistan Begins Work on Shaheen-II," The Hindu,
27 September 1999. Proliferation: Threat and Response 2000 notes that
Pakistani officials have mentioned the Shaheen-II and Ghaznavi, but does not
comment on the projects themselves.
18. See "Pakistan Tests Ghauri 3 Engine; Says New Shaheen Missile in Development,"
Current Missile News, Center for Defense and International Security Studies,
9 July 1999 ; "Pakistan Tests Ghauri III Engine," Jane's Defence Weekly,
13 October 1999, p. 6.
19. See "South Korea Launches Missile in Its First Test Since Last Year"
New York Times, November 22, 2001.
20. The Jerusalem Post reported development of an advanced Syrian modification
of the Scud-C (possibly the Scud-D tested September 2000?), but this report
has not been confirmed by Western sources. See Arieh O'Sullivan, "Syrian Super
Scud Ready Soon-Source," Jerusalem Post, 16 September 1999.
21. There is some debate regarding the origins of the 700 km Scud-D that Syria
tested in September 2000. The term Scud-D generally refers to extended range
Scuds developed and exported by North Korea. According to U.S. and Israeli officials,
the Syrian Scud-D is not a North Korean missile, but rather an extended-range
Scud-C that Syria developed indigenously. This missile uses a motor similar
to the Scud-C but has a larger fuselage that allows it to carry more fuel. Syria
now may have serial production capability of this missile. See "Syria Preparing
to Build Extended-Range 'Scud'" Jane's Defence Weekly, 19 June 2002.
22. This program was reportedly initiated in autumn 1995 and is based on the
Sky Bow II SAM.
23. See "India Follows Pakistan In Test-Firing Missile." Washington
Post, 5 October 2002, p.13
24. See "Iran: Tehran Confirms Successful Shahab-3 Test." Global
Security Newswire, 28 May 2002. Iranian Defense Minister, Ali Shamkhani,
indicated that the test did not signify the start of production or any increase
in the missile's present range, 800-miles. He also suggested that Iran has no
plans of developing a Shahab-4 or Shahab-5.
25. See: "Shahab-3/Zelzal-3" GlobalSecurity.org. This failed test
is thought to be the fourth or fifth flight test of the Shahab-3 missile, which
was to be ready for deployment by the end of 2002.
26. See: "Syria Preparing to Build Extended-Range 'Scud.'" Jane's
Defence Weekly. By Steve Rodan. June 19, 2002.
27. See "India Successfully Test-Fires Agni-I Missile," Times of
India Online. By Rajat Pandit. January 9, 2003
28. See "Pakistan Blasts Indian Missile Test." CNN News Online.
January 9, 2003
29. See "India, Pakistan Trade Tit-for-Tat Missile Tests." Arms
Control Today. By Rose Gordon. April 2003
30. See "India, Pakistan Test-Fire Missiles." PakTribune. March
27, 2003
31. See "India Test Fires Medium Range Prithvi Missile." Space
Daily. April 29, 2003
32. See "Iran Successfully Tests Shahab III." Jane's Defence Weekly.
July 9, 2003
Missile Types:
Ballistic missiles differ from military rockets, such as the widely proliferated FROG system, because they have guidance systems. Click here for a list of countries possessing FROGs. The development of accurate guidance systems remains one of the most challenging engineering obstacles facing states wishing to indigenously develop ballistic missiles. Only 11 nations have missiles with ranges over 1000 km; all the rest have only short-range, Scud-type missiles. Only 8 nations have been able to devleop nuclear weapons that could be fitted as warheads on these missiles.
Ballistic missiles are sometimes confused with cruise missiles. A ballistic missile is one whose payload reaches its target by way of an initial powered boost and then a free flight along a high arcing trajectory. Part of the flight of longer-range ballistic missiles may occur outside the atmosphere and involve the "reentry" of a warhead or the missile. A cruise missile, as defined by the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, is "an unmanned, self-propelled vehicle that sustains flight through the use of aerodynamic lift over most of its flight path." Such a missile may carry either a nuclear or conventional warhead (definitions are taken from an arms control glossary provided by the U.S. State Department). The U.S. National Air Intelligence Center further stipulates that cruise missiles are "usually categorized by intended mission and launch mode" e.g. anti-shipping cruise missile, land-attack cruise missile, air-launched cruise missile, submarine-launched cruise missile. Click here for information on land-attack cruise missiles.
For more resources, please visit our pages devoted to Missile Proliferation and Missile Defenses.
We welcome your comments. If you are aware of information that could update this table, or of sources that could expand the information on this page, please e-mail the Project.