North Korea’s nuclear program continues to concern the international community; progress on the six-party talks has been intermittent and North Korea’s profound isolation complicates negotiations. Carnegie experts assess the proliferation risk North Korea’s nuclear program poses and the policy options available as the global community attempts to gain a fuller understanding of the program.
With external pressure and internal problems causing increasing strain in Pyongyang, the Obama administration’s Special Envoy to North Korea can afford to be patient and wait out Kim Jong Il’s maneuvers over nuclear talks.
Since China’s core interests regarding North Korea have not changed, its highly risk-averse approach, which focuses on mediation and limited pressure, will probably continue.
By stopping in Seoul and addressing its security and trade concerns with sincerity and action, Obama can demonstrate American commitment to its ally South Korea and to the entire region.
The current stalemate of the IAEA's investigation of undeclared nuclear activities in Syria is the responsibility of the Syrian government, which buried the remains of its covert nuclear reactor in 2008 and now seeks to bury the IAEA investigation.
Responding to non-compliance is a promising area for progress at the 2010 Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference, because it imposes no additional burden on states that are playing by the rules.
There is no single solution to the financial crisis for middle-income countries, but fundamental labor markets reforms that create high-paying jobs are key to restarting economic growth.
The international community should stand back and reflect on the lessons learned from the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA) experience in implementing safeguards over the last decade, particularly in North Korea and Iran. Such review and reflection suggests that just when safeguards are getting better, the political will to use them effectively seems to be waning.