| Approved
by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of
the North Atlantic Council in Washington D.C. on 23rd and 24th April
1999
INTRODUCTION
1. At their Summit meeting in Washington in April 1999, NATO Heads
of State and
Government approved the Alliance's new Strategic Concept.
2. NATO has successfully ensured the freedom of its members and prevented
war in Europe
during the 40 years of the Cold War. By combining defence with dialogue,
it played an
indispensable role in bringing East-West confrontation to a peaceful
end. The dramatic changes
in the Euro-Atlantic strategic landscape brought by the end of the
Cold War were reflected in
the Alliance's 1991 Strategic Concept. There have, however, been further
profound political and
security developments since then.
3. The dangers of the Cold War have given way to more promising, but
also challenging
prospects, to new opportunities and risks. A new Europe of greater
integration is emerging, and
a Euro-Atlantic security structure is evolving in which NATO plays
a central part. The Alliance
has been at the heart of efforts to establish new patterns of cooperation
and mutual
understanding across the Euro-Atlantic region and has committed itself
to essential new activities
in the interest of a wider stability. It has shown the depth of that
commitment in its efforts to put
an end to the immense human suffering created by conflict in the Balkans.
The years since the
end of the Cold War have also witnessed important developments in arms
control, a process to
which the Alliance is fully committed. The Alliance's role in these
positive developments has been
underpinned by the comprehensive adaptation of its approach to security
and of its procedures
and structures. The last ten years have also seen, however, the appearance
of complex new risks
to Euro-Atlantic peace and stability, including oppression, ethnic
conflict, economic distress, the
collapse of political order, and the proliferation of weapons of mass
destruction.
4. The Alliance has an indispensable role to play in consolidating
and preserving the positive
changes of the recent past, and in meeting current and future security
challenges. It has,
therefore, a demanding agenda. It must safeguard common security interests
in an environment of
further, often unpredictable change. It must maintain collective defence
and reinforce the
transatlantic link and ensure a balance that allows the European Allies
to assume greater
responsibility. It must deepen its relations with its partners and
prepare for the accession of new
members. It must, above all, maintain the political will and the military
means required by the
entire range of its missions.
5. This new Strategic Concept will guide the Alliance as it pursues
this agenda. It expresses
NATO's enduring purpose and nature and its fundamental security tasks,
identifies the central
features of the new security environment, specifies the elements of
the Alliance's broad approach
to security, and provides guidelines for the further adaptation of
its military forces.
PART I - THE PURPOSE AND TASKS OF THE ALLIANCE
6. NATO’s essential and enduring purpose, set out in the Washington
Treaty, is to safeguard the
freedom and security of all its members by political and military means.
Based on common
values of democracy, human rights and the rule of law, the Alliance
has striven since its inception
to secure a just and lasting peaceful order in Europe. It will continue
to do so. The achievement
of this aim can be put at risk by crisis and conflict affecting the
security of the Euro-Atlantic area.
The Alliance therefore not only ensures the defence of its members
but contributes to peace and
stability in this region.
7. The Alliance embodies the transatlantic link by which the security
of North America is
permanently tied to the security of Europe. It is the practical expression
of effective collective
effort among its members in support of their common interests.
8. The fundamental guiding principle by which the Alliance works is
that of common commitment
and mutual co-operation among sovereign states in support of the indivisibility
of security for all
of its members. Solidarity and cohesion within the Alliance, through
daily cooperation in both the
political and military spheres, ensure that no single Ally is forced
to rely upon its own national
efforts alone in dealing with basic security challenges. Without depriving
member states of their
right and duty to assume their sovereign responsibilities in the field
of defence, the Alliance
enables them through collective effort to realise their essential national
security objectives.
9. The resulting sense of equal security among the members of the
Alliance, regardless of
differences in their circumstances or in their national military capabilities,
contributes to stability in
the Euro-Atlantic area. The Alliance does not seek these benefits for
its members alone, but is
committed to the creation of conditions conducive to increased partnership,
cooperation, and
dialogue with others who share its broad political objectives.
10. To achieve its essential purpose, as an Alliance of nations committed
to the Washington
Treaty and the United Nations Charter, the Alliance performs the following
fundamental security
tasks:
Security: To provide one of the indispensable foundations for a stable
Euro-Atlantic security
environment, based on the growth of democratic institutions and commitment
to the peaceful
resolution of disputes, in which no country would be able to intimidate
or coerce any other
through the threat or use of force.
Consultation: To serve, as provided for in Article 4 of the Washington
Treaty, as an essential
transatlantic forum for Allied consultations on any issues that affect
their vital interests, including
possible developments posing risks for members' security, and for appropriate
co-ordination of
their efforts in fields of common concern.
Deterrence and Defence: To deter and defend against any threat of
aggression against any
NATO member state as provided for in Articles 5 and 6 of the Washington
Treaty.
And in order to enhance the security and stability of the Euro-Atlantic
area:
- Crisis Management: To stand ready, case-by-case and by consensus,
in conformity with
Article 7 of the Washington Treaty, to contribute to effective conflict
prevention and to engage
actively in crisis management, including crisis response operations.
- Partnership: To promote wide-ranging partnership, cooperation, and
dialogue with other
countries in the Euro-Atlantic area, with the aim of increasing transparency,
mutual confidence
and the capacity for joint action with the Alliance.
11. In fulfilling its purpose and fundamental security tasks, the
Alliance will continue to respect
the legitimate security interests of others, and seek the peaceful
resolution of disputes as set out
in the Charter of the United Nations. The Alliance will promote peaceful
and friendly
international relations and support democratic institutions. The Alliance
does not consider itself to
be any country’s adversary.
PART II - STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES
THE EVOLVING STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENT
12. The Alliance operates in an environment of continuing change.
Developments in recent years
have been generally positive, but uncertainties and risks remain which
can develop into acute
crises. Within this evolving context, NATO has played an essential
part in strengthening
Euro-Atlantic security since the end of the Cold War. Its growing political
role; its increased
political and military partnership, cooperation and dialogue with other
states, including with
Russia, Ukraine and Mediterranean Dialogue countries; its continuing
openness to the accession
of new members; its collaboration with other international organisations;
its commitment,
exemplified in the Balkans, to conflict prevention and crisis management,
including through peace
support operations: all reflect its determination to shape its security
environment and enhance the
peace and stability of the Euro-Atlantic area.
13. In parallel, NATO has successfully adapted to enhance its ability
to contribute to
Euro-Atlantic peace and stability. Internal reform has included a new
command structure,
including the Combined Joint Task Force (CJTF) concept, the creation
of arrangements to
permit the rapid deployment of forces for the full range of the Alliance’s
missions, and the
building of the European Security and Defence Identity (ESDI) within
the Alliance.
14.The United Nations (UN), the Organisation for Security and Cooperation
in Europe
(OSCE), the European Union (EU), and the Western European Union (WEU)
have made
distinctive contributions to Euro-Atlantic security and stability.
Mutually reinforcing
organisations have become a central feature of the security environment.
15.The United Nations Security Council has the primary responsibility
for the maintenance of
international peace and security and, as such, plays a crucial role
in contributing to security
and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area.
16. The OSCE, as a regional arrangement, is the most inclusive security
organisation in Europe, which also includes Canada and the United States,
and
plays an essential role in promoting peace and stability, enhancing
cooperative
security, and advancing democracy and human rights in Europe. The OSCE
is
particularly active in the fields of preventive diplomacy, conflict
prevention, crisis
management, and post-conflict rehabilitation. NATO and the OSCE have
developed close practical cooperation, especially with regard to the
international
effort to bring peace to the former Yugoslavia.
17. The European Union has taken important decisions and given a further
impetus
to its efforts to strengthen its security and defence dimension. This
process will have
implications for the entire Alliance, and all European Allies should
be involved in it,
building on arrangements developed by NATO and the WEU. The development
of
a common foreign and security policy (CFSP) includes the progressive
framing of a
common defence policy. Such a policy, as called for in the Amsterdam
Treaty,
would be compatible with the common security and defence policy established
within the framework of the Washington Treaty. Important steps taken
in this
context include the incorporation of the WEU’s Petersberg tasks
into the Treaty on
European Union and the development of closer institutional relations
with the
WEU.
18. As stated in the 1994 Summit declaration and reaffirmed in Berlin
in 1996, the
Alliance fully supports the development of the European Security and
Defence
Identity within the Alliance by making available its assets and capabilities
for
WEU-led operations. To this end, the Alliance and the WEU have developed
a
close relationship and put into place key elements of the ESDI as agreed
in Berlin.
In order to enhance peace and stability in Europe and more widely,
the European
Allies are strengthening their capacity for action, including by increasing
their
military capabilities. The increase of the responsibilities and capacities
of the
European Allies with respect to security and defence enhances the security
environment of the Alliance.
19. The stability, transparency, predictability, lower levels of armaments,
and
verification which can be provided by arms control and non-proliferation
agreements support NATO's political and military efforts to achieve
its strategic
objectives. The Allies have played a major part in the significant
achievements in
this field. These include the enhanced stability produced by the CFE
Treaty, the
deep reductions in nuclear weapons provided for in the START treaties;
the
signature of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, the indefinite and
unconditional
extension of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the accession to
it of Belarus,
Kazakhstan, and Ukraine as non-nuclear weapons states, and the entry
into force
of the Chemical Weapons Convention. The Ottawa Convention to ban
anti-personnel landmines and similar agreements make an important contribution
to
alleviating human suffering. There are welcome prospects for further
advances in
arms control in conventional weapons and with respect to nuclear, chemical,
and
biological (NBC) weapons.
SECURITY CHALLENGES AND RISKS
20. Notwithstanding positive developments in the strategic environment
and the fact
that large-scale conventional aggression against the Alliance is highly
unlikely, the
possibility of such a threat emerging over the longer term exists.
The security of the
Alliance remains subject to a wide variety of military and non-military
risks which
are multi-directional and often difficult to predict. These risks include
uncertainty
and instability in and around the Euro-Atlantic area and the possibility
of regional
crises at the periphery of the Alliance, which could evolve rapidly.
Some countries
in and around the Euro-Atlantic area face serious economic, social
and political
difficulties. Ethnic and religious rivalries, territorial disputes,
inadequate or failed
efforts at reform, the abuse of human rights, and the dissolution of
states can lead to
local and even regional instability. The resulting tensions could lead
to crises
affecting Euro-Atlantic stability, to human suffering, and to armed
conflicts. Such
conflicts could affect the security of the Alliance by spilling over
into neighbouring
countries, including NATO countries, or in other ways, and could also
affect the
security of other states.
21. The existence of powerful nuclear forces outside the Alliance
also constitutes a
significant factor which the Alliance has to take into account if security
and stability
in the Euro-Atlantic area are to be maintained.
22. The proliferation of NBC weapons and their means of delivery remains
a
matter of serious concern. In spite of welcome progress in strengthening
international non-proliferation regimes, major challenges with respect
to
proliferation remain. The Alliance recognises that proliferation can
occur despite
efforts to prevent it and can pose a direct military threat to the
Allies' populations,
territory, and forces. Some states, including on NATO's periphery and
in other
regions, sell or acquire or try to acquire NBC weapons and delivery
means.
Commodities and technology that could be used to build these weapons
of mass
destruction and their delivery means are becoming more common, while
detection
and prevention of illicit trade in these materials and know-how continues
to be
difficult. Non-state actors have shown the potential to create and
use some of these
weapons.
23. The global spread of technology that can be of use in the production
of
weapons may result in the greater availability of sophisticated military
capabilities,
permitting adversaries to acquire highly capable offensive and defensive
air, land,
and sea-borne systems, cruise missiles, and other advanced weaponry.
In addition,
state and non-state adversaries may try to exploit the Alliance's growing
reliance on
information systems through information operations designed to disrupt
such
systems. They may attempt to use strategies of this kind to counter
NATO’s
superiority in traditional weaponry.
24.Any armed attack on the territory of the Allies, from whatever
direction, would be
covered by Articles 5 and 6 of the Washington Treaty. However, Alliance
security must
also take account of the global context. Alliance security interests
can be affected by other
risks of a wider nature, including acts of terrorism, sabotage and
organised crime, and by
the disruption of the flow of vital resources. The uncontrolled movement
of large numbers
of people, particularly as a consequence of armed conflicts, can also
pose problems for
security and stability affecting the Alliance. Arrangements exist within
the Alliance for
consultation among the Allies under Article 4 of the Washington Treaty
and, where
appropriate, co-ordination of their efforts including their responses
to risks of this kind.
PART III – THE APPROACH TO SECURITY IN THE 21ST CENTURY
25. The Alliance is committed to a broad approach to security, which
recognises
the importance of political, economic, social and environmental factors
in addition
to the indispensable defence dimension. This broad approach forms the
basis for
the Alliance to accomplish its fundamental security tasks effectively,
and its
increasing effort to develop effective cooperation with other European
and
Euro-Atlantic organisations as well as the United Nations. Our collective
aim is to
build a European security architecture in which the Alliance’s
contribution to the
security and stability of the Euro-Atlantic area and the contribution
of these other
international organisations are complementary and mutually reinforcing,
both in
deepening relations among Euro-Atlantic countries and in managing crises.
NATO
remains the essential forum for consultation among the Allies and the
forum for
agreement on policies bearing on the security and defence commitments
of its
members under the Washington Treaty.
26. The Alliance seeks to preserve peace and to reinforce Euro-Atlantic
security
and stability by: the preservation of the transatlantic link; the maintenance
of
effective military capabilities sufficient for deterrence and defence
and to fulfil the
full range of its missions; the development of the European Security
and Defence
Identity within the Alliance; an overall capability to manage crises
successfully; its
continued openness to new members; and the continued pursuit of partnership,
cooperation, and dialogue with other nations as part of its co-operative
approach
to Euro-Atlantic security, including in the field of arms control and
disarmament.
THE TRANSATLANTIC LINK
27. NATO is committed to a strong and dynamic partnership between
Europe and
North America in support of the values and interests they share. The
security of
Europe and that of North America are indivisible. Thus the Alliance’s
commitment
to the indispensable transatlantic link and the collective defence
of its members is
fundamental to its credibility and to the security and stability of
the Euro-Atlantic
area.
THE MAINTENANCE OF ALLIANCE MILITARY CAPABILITIES
28. The maintenance of an adequate military capability and clear preparedness
to
act collectively in the common defence remain central to the Alliance's
security
objectives. Such a capability, together with political solidarity,
remains at the core
of the Alliance's ability to prevent any attempt at coercion or intimidation,
and to
guarantee that military aggression directed against the Alliance can
never be
perceived as an option with any prospect of success.
29. Military capabilities effective under the full range of foreseeable
circumstances
are also the basis of the Alliance's ability to contribute to conflict
prevention and
crisis management through non-Article 5 crisis response operations.
These missions
can be highly demanding and can place a premium on the same political
and military
qualities, such as cohesion, multinational training, and extensive
prior planning, that
would be essential in an Article 5 situation. Accordingly, while they
may pose
special requirements, they will be handled through a common set of
Alliance
structures and procedures.
THE EUROPEAN SECURITY AND DEFENCE IDENTITY
30. The Alliance, which is the foundation of the collective defence
of its members
and through which common security objectives will be pursued wherever
possible,
remains committed to a balanced and dynamic transatlantic partnership.
The
European Allies have taken decisions to enable them to assume greater
responsibilities in the security and defence field in order to enhance
the peace and
stability of the Euro-Atlantic area and thus the security of all Allies.
On the basis of
decisions taken by the Alliance, in Berlin in 1996 and subsequently,
the European
Security and Defence Identity will continue to be developed within
NATO. This
process will require close cooperation between NATO, the WEU and, if
and when
appropriate, the European Union. It will enable all European Allies
to make a more
coherent and effective contribution to the missions and activities
of the Alliance as
an expression of our shared responsibilities; it will reinforce the
transatlantic
partnership; and it will assist the European Allies to act by themselves
as required
through the readiness of the Alliance, on a case-by-case basis and
by consensus, to
make its assets and capabilities available for operations in which
the Alliance is not
engaged militarily under the political control and strategic direction
either of the
WEU or as otherwise agreed, taking into account the full participation
of all
European Allies if they were so to choose.
CONFLICT PREVENTION AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT
31. In pursuit of its policy of preserving peace, preventing war,
and enhancing
security and stability and as set out in the fundamental security tasks,
NATO will
seek, in cooperation with other organisations, to prevent conflict,
or, should a crisis
arise, to contribute to its effective management, consistent with international
law,
including through the possibility of conducting non-Article 5 crisis
response
operations. The Alliance’s preparedness to carry out such operations
supports the
broader objective of reinforcing and extending stability and often
involves the
participation of NATO’s Partners. NATO recalls its offer, made
in Brussels in
1994, to support on a case-by-case basis in accordance with its own
procedures,
peacekeeping and other operations under the authority of the UN Security
Council
or the responsibility of the OSCE, including by making available Alliance
resources
and expertise. In this context NATO recalls its subsequent decisions
with respect
to crisis response operations in the Balkans. Taking into account the
necessity for
Alliance solidarity and cohesion, participation in any such operation
or mission will
remain subject to decisions of member states in accordance with national
constitutions.
32. NATO will make full use of partnership, cooperation and dialogue
and its links
to other organisations to contribute to preventing crises and, should
they arise,
defusing them at an early stage. A coherent approach to crisis management,
as in
any use of force by the Alliance, will require the Alliance's political
authorities to
choose and co-ordinate appropriate responses from a range of both political
and
military measures and to exercise close political control at all stages.
PARTNERSHIP, COOPERATION, AND DIALOGUE
33. Through its active pursuit of partnership, cooperation, and dialogue,
the
Alliance is a positive force in promoting security and stability throughout
the
Euro-Atlantic area. Through outreach and openness, the Alliance seeks
to preserve
peace, support and promote democracy, contribute to prosperity and
progress,
and foster genuine partnership with and among all democratic Euro-Atlantic
countries. This aims at enhancing the security of all, excludes nobody,
and helps to
overcome divisions and disagreements that could lead to instability
and conflict.
34. The Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council (EAPC) will remain the overarching
framework for all aspects of NATO’s cooperation with its Partners.
It offers an
expanded political dimension for both consultation and cooperation.
EAPC
consultations build increased transparency and confidence among its
members on
security issues, contribute to conflict prevention and crisis management,
and
develop practical cooperation activities, including in civil emergency
planning, and
scientific and environmental affairs.
35. The Partnership for Peace is the principal mechanism for forging
practical
security links between the Alliance and its Partners and for enhancing
interoperability between Partners and NATO. Through detailed programmes
that
reflect individual Partners’ capacities and interests, Allies
and Partners work
towards transparency in national defence planning and budgeting; democratic
control of defence forces; preparedness for civil disasters and other
emergencies;
and the development of the ability to work together, including in NATO-led
PfP
operations. The Alliance is committed to increasing the role the Partners
play in PfP
decision-making and planning, and making PfP more operational. NATO
has
undertaken to consult with any active participant in the Partnership
if that Partner
perceives a direct threat to its territorial integrity, political independence,
or
security.
36. Russia plays a unique role in Euro-Atlantic security. Within the
framework of
the NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security,
NATO and Russia have committed themselves to developing their relations
on the
basis of common interest, reciprocity and transparency to achieve a
lasting and
inclusive peace in the Euro-Atlantic area based on the principles of
democracy and
co-operative security. NATO and Russia have agreed to give concrete
substance
to their shared commitment to build a stable, peaceful and undivided
Europe. A
strong, stable and enduring partnership between NATO and Russia is
essential to
achieve lasting stability in the Euro-Atlantic area.
37. Ukraine occupies a special place in the Euro-Atlantic security
environment and
is an important and valuable partner in promoting stability and common
democratic
values. NATO is committed to further strengthening its distinctive
partnership with
Ukraine on the basis of the NATO-Ukraine Charter, including political
consultations on issues of common concern and a broad range of practical
cooperation activities. The Alliance continues to support Ukrainian
sovereignty and
independence, territorial integrity, democratic development, economic
prosperity
and its status as a non-nuclear weapons state as key factors of stability
and security
in central and eastern Europe and in Europe as a whole.
38. The Mediterranean is an area of special interest to the Alliance.
Security in
Europe is closely linked to security and stability in the Mediterranean.
NATO’s
Mediterranean Dialogue process is an integral part of NATO’s
co-operative
approach to security. It provides a framework for confidence building,
promotes
transparency and cooperation in the region, and reinforces and is reinforced
by
other international efforts. The Alliance is committed to developing
progressively
the political, civil, and military aspects of the Dialogue with the
aim of achieving
closer cooperation with, and more active involvement by, countries
that are
partners in this Dialogue.
ENLARGEMENT
39. The Alliance remains open to new members under Article 10 of the
Washington Treaty. It expects to extend further invitations in coming
years to
nations willing and able to assume the responsibilities and obligations
of
membership, and as NATO determines that the inclusion of these nations
would
serve the overall political and strategic interests of the Alliance,
strengthen its
effectiveness and cohesion, and enhance overall European security and
stability. To
this end, NATO has established a programme of activities to assist
aspiring
countries in their preparations for possible future membership in the
context of its
wider relationship with them. No European democratic country whose
admission
would fulfil the objectives of the Treaty will be excluded from consideration.
ARMS CONTROL, DISARMAMENT, AND NON-PROLIFERATION
40. The Alliance's policy of support for arms control, disarmament,
and
non-proliferation will continue to play a major role in the achievement
of the
Alliance's security objectives. The Allies seek to enhance security
and stability at
the lowest possible level of forces consistent with the Alliance’s
ability to provide
for collective defence and to fulfil the full range of its missions.
The Alliance will
continue to ensure that - as an important part of its broad approach
to security -
defence and arms control, disarmament, and non-proliferation objectives
remain in
harmony. The Alliance will continue to actively contribute to the development
of
arms control, disarmament, and non-proliferation agreements as well
as to
confidence and security building measures. The Allies take seriously
their distinctive
role in promoting a broader, more comprehensive and more verifiable
international
arms control and disarmament process. The Alliance will enhance its
political
efforts to reduce dangers arising from the proliferation of weapons
of mass
destruction and their means of delivery. The principal non-proliferation
goal of the
Alliance and its members is to prevent proliferation from occurring
or, should it
occur, to reverse it through diplomatic means. The Alliance attaches
great
importance to the continuing validity and the full implementation by
all parties of the
CFE Treaty as an essential element in ensuring the stability of the
Euro-Atlantic
area.
PART IV - GUIDELINES FOR THE ALLIANCE'S FORCES
PRINCIPLES OF ALLIANCE STRATEGY
41. The Alliance will maintain the necessary military capabilities
to accomplish the
full range of NATO’s missions. The principles of Allied solidarity
and strategic unity
remain paramount for all Alliance missions. Alliance forces must safeguard
NATO's
military effectiveness and freedom of action. The security of all Allies
is indivisible:
an attack on one is an attack on all. With respect to collective defence
under
Article 5 of the Washington Treaty, the combined military forces of
the Alliance
must be capable of deterring any potential aggression against it, of
stopping an
aggressor's advance as far forward as possible should an attack nevertheless
occur, and of ensuring the political independence and territorial integrity
of its
member states. They must also be prepared to contribute to conflict
prevention and
to conduct non-Article 5 crisis response operations. The Alliance's
forces have
essential roles in fostering cooperation and understanding with NATO's
Partners
and other states, particularly in helping Partners to prepare for potential
participation in NATO-led PfP operations. Thus they contribute to the
preservation
of peace, to the safeguarding of common security interests of Alliance
members,
and to the maintenance of the security and stability of the Euro-Atlantic
area. By
deterring the use of NBC weapons, they contribute to Alliance efforts
aimed at
preventing the proliferation of these weapons and their delivery means.
42. The achievement of the Alliance's aims depends critically on the
equitable
sharing of the roles, risks and responsibilities, as well as the benefits,
of common
defence. The presence of United States conventional and nuclear forces
in Europe
remains vital to the security of Europe, which is inseparably linked
to that of North
America. The North American Allies contribute to the Alliance through
military
forces available for Alliance missions, through their broader contribution
to
international peace and security, and through the provision of unique
training
facilities on the North American continent. The European Allies also
make
wide-ranging and substantial contributions. As the process of developing
the ESDI
within the Alliance progresses, the European Allies will further enhance
their
contribution to the common defence and to international peace and stability
including through multinational formations.
43. The principle of collective effort in Alliance defence is embodied
in practical
arrangements that enable the Allies to enjoy the crucial political,
military and
resource advantages of collective defence, and prevent the renationalisation
of
defence policies, without depriving the Allies of their sovereignty.
These
arrangements also enable NATO's forces to carry out non-Article 5 crisis
response
operations and constitute a prerequisite for a coherent Alliance response
to all
possible contingencies. They are based on procedures for consultation,
an
integrated military structure, and on co-operation agreements. Key
features include
collective force planning; common funding; common operational planning;
multinational formations, headquarters and command arrangements; an
integrated
air defence system; a balance of roles and responsibilities among the
Allies; the
stationing and deployment of forces outside home territory when required;
arrangements, including planning, for crisis management and reinforcement;
common standards and procedures for equipment, training and logistics;
joint and
combined doctrines and exercises when appropriate; and infrastructure,
armaments
and logistics cooperation. The inclusion of NATO's Partners in such
arrangements
or the development of similar arrangements for them, in appropriate
areas, is also
instrumental in enhancing cooperation and common efforts in Euro-Atlantic
security
matters.
44. Multinational funding, including through the Military Budget and
the NATO
Security Investment Programme, will continue to play an important role
in acquiring
and maintaining necessary assets and capabilities. The management of
resources
should be guided by the military requirements of the Alliance as they
evolve.
45. The Alliance supports the further development of the ESDI within
the Alliance,
including by being prepared to make available assets and capabilities
for operations
under the political control and strategic direction either of the WEU
or as otherwise
agreed.
46. To protect peace and to prevent war or any kind of coercion, the
Alliance will
maintain for the foreseeable future an appropriate mix of nuclear and
conventional
forces based in Europe and kept up to date where necessary, although
at a
minimum sufficient level. Taking into account the diversity of risks
with which the
Alliance could be faced, it must maintain the forces necessary to ensure
credible
deterrence and to provide a wide range of conventional response options.
But the
Alliance's conventional forces alone cannot ensure credible deterrence.
Nuclear
weapons make a unique contribution in rendering the risks of aggression
against the
Alliance incalculable and unacceptable. Thus, they remain essential
to preserve
peace.
THE ALLIANCE’S FORCE POSTURE
The Missions of Alliance Military Forces
47. The primary role of Alliance military forces is to protect peace
and to guarantee
the territorial integrity, political independence and security of member
states. The
Alliance's forces must therefore be able to deter and defend effectively,
to maintain
or restore the territorial integrity of Allied nations and – in
case of conflict – to
terminate war rapidly by making an aggressor reconsider his decision,
cease his
attack and withdraw. NATO forces must maintain the ability to provide
for
collective defence while conducting effective non-Article 5 crisis
response
operations.
48. The maintenance of the security and stability of the Euro-Atlantic
area is of key
importance. An important aim of the Alliance and its forces is to keep
risks at a
distance by dealing with potential crises at an early stage. In the
event of crises
which jeopardise Euro-Atlantic stability and could affect the security
of Alliance
members, the Alliance's military forces may be called upon to conduct
crisis
response operations. They may also be called upon to contribute to
the
preservation of international peace and security by conducting operations
in
support of other international organisations, complementing and reinforcing
political
actions within a broad approach to security.
49. In contributing to the management of crises through military operations,
the
Alliance’s forces will have to deal with a complex and diverse
range of actors,
risks, situations and demands, including humanitarian emergencies.
Some
non-Article 5 crisis response operations may be as demanding as some
collective
defence missions. Well-trained and well-equipped forces at adequate
levels of
readiness and in sufficient strength to meet the full range of contingencies
as well as
the appropriate support structures, planning tools and command and
control
capabilities are essential in providing efficient military contributions.
The Alliance
should also be prepared to support, on the basis of separable but not
separate
capabilities, operations under the political control and strategic
direction either of
the WEU or as otherwise agreed. The potential participation of Partners
and other
non-NATO nations in NATO-led operations as well as possible operations
with
Russia would be further valuable elements of NATO’s contribution
to managing
crises that affect Euro-Atlantic security.
50. Alliance military forces also contribute to promoting stability
throughout the
Euro-Atlantic area by their participation in military-to-military contacts
and in other
cooperation activities and exercises under the Partnership for Peace
as well as
those organised to deepen NATO’s relationships with Russia, Ukraine
and the
Mediterranean Dialogue countries. They contribute to stability and
understanding
by participating in confidence-building activities, including those
which enhance
transparency and improve communication; as well as in verification
of arms control
agreements and in humanitarian de-mining. Key areas of consultation
and
cooperation could include inter alia: training and exercises, interoperability,
civil-military relations, concept and doctrine development, defence
planning, crisis
management, proliferation issues, armaments cooperation as well as
participation in
operational planning and operations.
Guidelines for the Alliance’s Force Posture
51. To implement the Alliance’s fundamental security tasks and
the principles of its
strategy, the forces of the Alliance must continue to be adapted to
meet the
requirements of the full range of Alliance missions effectively and
to respond to
future challenges. The posture of Allies' forces, building on the strengths
of different
national defence structures, will conform to the guidelines developed
in the
following paragraphs.
52. The size, readiness, availability and deployment of the Alliance's
military forces
will reflect its commitment to collective defence and to conduct crisis
response
operations, sometimes at short notice, distant from their home stations,
including
beyond the Allies’ territory. The characteristics of the Alliance's
forces will also
reflect the provisions of relevant arms control agreements. Alliance
forces must be
adequate in strength and capabilities to deter and counter aggression
against any
Ally. They must be interoperable and have appropriate doctrines and
technologies.
They must be held at the required readiness and deployability, and
be capable of
military success in a wide range of complex joint and combined operations,
which
may also include Partners and other non-NATO nations.
53. This means in particular:
a. that the overall size of the Allies' forces will be kept at the
lowest levels
consistent with the requirements of collective defence and other Alliance
missions;
they will be held at appropriate and graduated readiness;
b. that the peacetime geographical distribution of forces will ensure
a sufficient
military presence throughout the territory of the Alliance, including
the stationing
and deployment of forces outside home territory and waters and forward
deployment of forces when and where necessary. Regional and, in particular,
geostrategic considerations within the Alliance will have to be taken
into account,
as instabilities on NATO’s periphery could lead to crises or
conflicts requiring an
Alliance military response, potentially with short warning times;
c. that NATO’s command structure will be able to undertake command
and
control of the full range of the Alliance's military missions including
through the use
of deployable combined and joint HQs, in particular CJTF headquarters,
to
command and control multinational and multiservice forces. It will
also be able to
support operations under the political control and strategic direction
either of the
WEU or as otherwise agreed, thereby contributing to the development
of the ESDI
within the Alliance, and to conduct NATO-led non-Article 5 crisis response
operations in which Partners and other countries may participate;
d. that overall, the Alliance will, in both the near and long term
and for the full range
of its missions, require essential operational capabilities such as
an effective
engagement capability; deployability and mobility; survivability of
forces and
infrastructure; and sustainability, incorporating logistics and force
rotation. To
develop these capabilities to their full potential for multinational
operations,
interoperability, including human factors, the use of appropriate advanced
technology, the maintenance of information superiority in military
operations, and
highly qualified personnel with a broad spectrum of skills will be
important.
Sufficient capabilities in the areas of command, control and communications
as well
as intelligence and surveillance will serve as necessary force multipliers;
e. that at any time a limited but militarily significant proportion
of ground, air and
sea forces will be able to react as rapidly as necessary to a wide
range of
eventualities, including a short-notice attack on any Ally. Greater
numbers of force
elements will be available at appropriate levels of readiness to sustain
prolonged
operations, whether within or beyond Alliance territory, including
through rotation
of deployed forces. Taken together, these forces must also be of sufficient
quality,
quantity and readiness to contribute to deterrence and to defend against
limited
attacks on the Alliance;
f. that the Alliance must be able to build up larger forces, both
in response to any
fundamental changes in the security environment and for limited requirements,
by
reinforcement, by mobilising reserves, or by reconstituting forces
when necessary.
This ability must be in proportion to potential threats to Alliance
security, including
potential long-term developments. It must take into account the possibility
of
substantial improvements in the readiness and capabilities of military
forces on the
periphery of the Alliance. Capabilities for timely reinforcement and
resupply both
within and from Europe and North America will remain of critical importance,
with
a resulting need for a high degree of deployability, mobility and flexibility;
g. that appropriate force structures and procedures, including those
that would
provide an ability to build up, deploy and draw down forces quickly
and
selectively, are necessary to permit measured, flexible and timely
responses in
order to reduce and defuse tensions. These arrangements must be exercised
regularly in peacetime;
h. that the Alliance’s defence posture must have the capability
to address
appropriately and effectively the risks associated with the proliferation
of NBC
weapons and their means of delivery, which also pose a potential threat
to the
Allies’ populations, territory, and forces. A balanced mix of
forces, response
capabilities and strengthened defences is needed;
i. that the Alliance's forces and infrastructure must be protected
against terrorist
attacks.
Characteristics of Conventional Forces
54. It is essential that the Allies' military forces have a credible
ability to fulfil the full
range of Alliance missions. This requirement has implications for force
structures,
force and equipment levels; readiness, availability, and sustainability;
training and
exercises; deployment and employment options; and force build-up and
mobilisation capabilities. The aim should be to achieve an optimum
balance
between high readiness forces capable of beginning rapidly, and immediately
as
necessary, collective defence or non-Article 5 crisis response operations;
forces at
different levels of lower readiness to provide the bulk of those required
for
collective defence, for rotation of forces to sustain crisis response
operations, or for
further reinforcement of a particular region; and a longer-term build-up
and
augmentation capability for the worst case -- but very remote -- scenario
of large
scale operations for collective defence. A substantial proportion of
Alliance forces
will be capable of performing more than one of these roles.
55. Alliance forces will be structured to reflect the multinational
and joint nature of
Alliance missions. Essential tasks will include controlling, protecting,
and defending
territory; ensuring the unimpeded use of sea, air, and land lines of
communication;
sea control and protecting the deployment of the Alliance’s sea-based
deterrent;
conducting independent and combined air operations; ensuring a secure
air
environment and effective extended air defence; surveillance, intelligence,
reconnaissance and electronic warfare; strategic lift; and providing
effective and
flexible command and control facilities, including deployable combined
and joint
headquarters.
56. The Alliance’s defence posture against the risks and potential
threats of the
proliferation of NBC weapons and their means of delivery must continue
to be
improved, including through work on missile defences. As NATO forces
may be
called upon to operate beyond NATO’s borders, capabilities for
dealing with
proliferation risks must be flexible, mobile, rapidly deployable and
sustainable.
Doctrines, planning, and training and exercise policies must also prepare
the
Alliance to deter and defend against the use of NBC weapons. The aim
in doing so
will be to further reduce operational vulnerabilities of NATO military
forces while
maintaining their flexibility and effectiveness despite the presence,
threat or use of
NBC weapons.
57. Alliance strategy does not include a chemical or biological warfare
capability.
The Allies support universal adherence to the relevant disarmament
regimes. But,
even if further progress with respect to banning chemical and biological
weapons
can be achieved, defensive precautions will remain essential.
58. Given reduced overall force levels and constrained resources,
the ability to
work closely together will remain vital for achieving the Alliance's
missions. The
Alliance's collective defence arrangements in which, for those concerned,
the
integrated military structure plays the key role, are essential in
this regard. The
various strands of NATO’s defence planning need to be effectively
coordinated at
all levels in order to ensure the preparedness of the forces and supporting
structures to carry out the full spectrum of their roles. Exchanges
of information
among the Allies about their force plans contribute to securing the
availability of the
capabilities needed for the execution of these roles. Consultations
in case of
important changes in national defence plans also remain of key importance.
Cooperation in the development of new operational concepts will be
essential for
responding to evolving security challenges. The detailed practical
arrangements that
have been developed as part of the ESDI within the Alliance contribute
to close
allied co-operation without unnecessary duplication of assets and capabilities.
59. To be able to respond flexibly to possible contingencies and to
permit the
effective conduct of Alliance missions, the Alliance requires sufficient
logistics
capabilities, including transport capacities, medical support and stocks
to deploy
and sustain all types of forces effectively. Standardisation will foster
cooperation
and cost-effectiveness in providing logistic support to allied forces.
Mounting and
sustaining operations outside the Allies' territory, where there may
be little or no
host-nation support, will pose special logistical challenges. The ability
to build-up
larger, adequately equipped and trained forces, in a timely manner
and to a level
able to fulfil the full range of Alliance missions, will also make
an essential
contribution to crisis management and defence. This will include the
ability to
reinforce any area at risk and to establish a multinational presence
when and where
this is needed. Forces of various kinds and at various levels of readiness
will be
capable of flexible employment in both intra-European and transatlantic
reinforcement. This will require control of lines of communication,
and appropriate
support and exercise arrangements.
60. The interaction between Alliance forces and the civil environment
(both
governmental and non-governmental) in which they operate is crucial
to the success
of operations. Civil-military cooperation is interdependent: military
means are
increasingly requested to assist civil authorities; at the same time
civil support to
military operations is important for logistics, communications, medical
support, and
public affairs. Cooperation between the Alliance's military and civil
bodies will
accordingly remain essential.
61. The Alliance’s ability to accomplish the full range of its
missions will rely
increasingly on multinational forces, complementing national commitments
to
NATO for the Allies concerned. Such forces, which are applicable to
the full range
of Alliance missions, demonstrate the Alliance's resolve to maintain
a credible
collective defence; enhance Alliance cohesion; and reinforce the transatlantic
partnership and strengthen the ESDI within the Alliance. Multinational
forces,
particularly those capable of deploying rapidly for collective defence
or for
non-Article 5 crisis response operations, reinforce solidarity. They
can also provide
a way of deploying more capable formations than might be available
purely
nationally, thus helping to make more efficient use of scarce defence
resources.
This may include a highly integrated, multinational approach to specific
tasks and
functions, an approach which underlies the implementation of the CJTF
concept.
For peace support operations, effective multinational formations and
other
arrangements involving Partners will be valuable. In order to exploit
fully the
potential offered by multinational formations, improving interoperability,
inter alia
through sufficient training and exercises, is of the highest importance.
Characteristics of Nuclear Forces
62. The fundamental purpose of the nuclear forces of the Allies is
political: to
preserve peace and prevent coercion and any kind of war. They will
continue to
fulfil an essential role by ensuring uncertainty in the mind of any
aggressor about the
nature of the Allies’ response to military aggression. They demonstrate
that
aggression of any kind is not a rational option. The supreme guarantee
of the
security of the Allies is provided by the strategic nuclear forces
of the Alliance,
particularly those of the United States; the independent nuclear forces
of the United
Kingdom and France, which have a deterrent role of their own, contribute
to the
overall deterrence and security of the Allies.
63. A credible Alliance nuclear posture and the demonstration of Alliance
solidarity
and common commitment to war prevention continue to require widespread
participation by European Allies involved in collective defence planning
in nuclear
roles, in peacetime basing of nuclear forces on their territory and
in command,
control and consultation arrangements. Nuclear forces based in Europe
and
committed to NATO provide an essential political and military link
between the
European and the North American members of the Alliance. The Alliance
will
therefore maintain adequate nuclear forces in Europe. These forces
need to have
the necessary characteristics and appropriate flexibility and survivability,
to be
perceived as a credible and effective element of the Allies’ strategy
in preventing
war. They will be maintained at the minimum level sufficient to preserve
peace and
stability.
64. The Allies concerned consider that, with the radical changes in
the security
situation, including reduced conventional force levels in Europe and
increased
reaction times, NATO’s ability to defuse a crisis through diplomatic
and other
means or, should it be necessary, to mount a successful conventional
defence has
significantly improved. The circumstances in which any use of nuclear
weapons
might have to be contemplated by them are therefore extremely remote.
Since
1991, therefore, the Allies have taken a series of steps which reflect
the post-Cold
War security environment. These include a dramatic reduction of the
types and
numbers of NATO’s sub-strategic forces including the elimination
of all nuclear
artillery and ground-launched short-range nuclear missiles; a significant
relaxation of
the readiness criteria for nuclear-roled forces; and the termination
of standing
peacetime nuclear contingency plans. NATO’s nuclear forces no
longer target any
country. Nonetheless, NATO will maintain, at the minimum level consistent
with the
prevailing security environment, adequate sub-strategic forces based
in Europe
which will provide an essential link with strategic nuclear forces,
reinforcing the
transatlantic link. These will consist of dual capable aircraft and
a small number of
United Kingdom Trident warheads. Sub-strategic nuclear weapons will,
however,
not be deployed in normal circumstances on surface vessels and attack
submarines.
PART V - CONCLUSION
65. As the North Atlantic Alliance enters its sixth decade, it must
be ready to meet
the challenges and opportunities of a new century. The Strategic Concept
reaffirms
the enduring purpose of the Alliance and sets out its fundamental security
tasks. It
enables a transformed NATO to contribute to the evolving security environment,
supporting security and stability with the strength of its shared commitment
to
democracy and the peaceful resolution of disputes. The Strategic Concept
will
govern the Alliance's security and defence policy, its operational
concepts, its
conventional and nuclear force posture and its collective defence arrangements,
and
will be kept under review in the light of the evolving security environment.
In an
uncertain world the need for effective defence remains, but in reaffirming
this
commitment the Alliance will also continue making full use of every
opportunity to
help build an undivided continent by promoting and fostering the vision
of a Europe
whole and free.
|