|
Government
Resources
Testimony
- Joseph
Cirincione, "A Deeply Flawed Review," Senate
Foreign Relations Committee, 16 May 2002
- Senator
Carl Levin, "Results of the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review," Senate
Armed Services Committee, 14 February 2002
- Senator
Daniel Akaka, "Results of the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review," Senate
Armed Services Committee, 14 February 2002
- Undersecretary
of Defense Policy Douglas Feith,"Results of the 2001 Nuclear
Posture Review," Senate Armed Services Committee, 14
February 2002 (pdf)
- Commander
in Chief-United States Strategic Command Admiral James O. Ellis,
Jr. USN, "Results of the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review," Senate
Armed Services Committee, 14 February 2002 (pdf)
- National
Nuclear Security Administrator General John A. Gordon, USAF (Ret.), "Results
of the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review" Senate
Armed Service Committee, 14 February 2002 (pdf)
Reports
and Publications
- Fire
In The Hole: Nuclear and Non-Nuclear Options For CounterproliferationA
New Carnegie Working Paper by Michael Levi comparing the potential
of new nuclear weapons with that of innovative non-nuclear weapons,
demonstrating that proponents of tactical nuclear weapons have
consistently overestimated their destructive potential while
underestimating the battlefield problems they would pose.
- Nuclear
Weapons Page- Reports and Resources Concerning Low-Yield/"Bunker
Buster" Nuclear Weapons
- "Briefing
Book on the Bush-Putin Summit and the U.S. Nuclear Posture Review," Center
for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation, May 2002
- Planning to be Surprised: The
US Nuclear Posture Review and its Implications for Arms Control," by
Mark Bromley, BASIC Paper #39, April 2002
- "Our
Dangerous New Nuclear Posture Review" by Thomas
Graham, Jr. and Damien J. LaVera, Lawyers Alliance for World Security,
March 2002
- "Faking
Nuclear Restraint: The Bush Administration's Secret Plan For Strengthening
U.S. Nuclear Forces" Natural Resouces Defense Council,
13 February 2002
- "Parsing
the Nuclear Posture Review," an ACA Panel Discussion
with Daryl Kimball, Janne Nolan and Rose Gottemoeller, January
2002
- Rationale
and Requirements for U.S. Nuclear Forces and Arms Control,
National Institute for Public Policy, January 2001 (pdf)
Video
excerpt from the 2001 Carnegie Non-Proliferation Conference Dr.
Scott Sagan, Co-Director of Stanford's Center on International
Security and Cooperation discusses the Nuclear Posture Review and
the use of nuclear weapons to deter chemical and biological weapons.
Articles
- "House
Discusses Nuclear Testing," Associated Press,
21 March 2002
- "Think
Anew About US Nukes," Christian Science Monitor Op-Ed
by Peter Scoblic, 19 March 2002
- "Bush
Finds That Ambiguity Is Part of Nuclear Deterrence" New
York Times, 18 March 2002
- "China
Accuses U.S. of 'Nuclear Blackmail'," Reuters,
16 March 2002
- "Old-Fashioned
Hide-Outs Fuel High-Tech Weaponry," Los Angeles
Times, 17 March 2002
- "US
Lowers Nuclear Barriers" Asia Times Op-Ed
by Ehsan Ahrari, 15 March 2002
- "Nuclear
Warhead Study Aims at Buried Targets, " Washington
Post, 15 March 2002
- "Nuclear
Alarmists," Washington Post Op-Ed by Richard
Sokolsky and Eugene Rumer, 15 March 2002
- "Bush
Puts Nuclear Use in 'Options Available'," Los
Angeles Times, 15 March 2002
- "The
Real Problems With Our Nuclear Posture," New
York Times Op-Ed by Andrew Krepinevich, 14 March 2002
- "Nuclear
Plan Changes Calculus of Deterrence" Chrisitan
Science Monitor, 14 March 2002
- "Nuts
About Nukes," Washington Post Op-Ed by Mary
McGrory, 14 March 2002
- "The
Nuclear Posture," Washington Post, 13 March
2002
- "North
Korea Hits Out at U.S. Nuclear Arms Review," Reuters,
13 March 2002
- "Russia
Questions US Nuclear Targeting" Associated Press,
13 March 2002
- "A
Twisted Posture," Boston Globe Editorial,
12 March 2002
- "Nuclear
Use as 'Option' Clouds Issue," Los Angeles Times,
12 March 2002
- "America
as Nuclear Rogue" New York Times Editorial,
12 March 2002
- "Bush's
Stealth Policy on N-arms" Boston
Globe Op-Ed by Thomas Oliphant, 12 March 2002
- "'Rogue'
Nations Policy Builds on Clinton's Lead," Washington
Post, 12 March 2002
- "Nuclear
Plan Meant to Deter," Los Angeles Times,
March 11, 2002
- "U.S.
Tries to Dampen Fear Abroad on Policy" New York
Times, 11 March 2002
New Nuclear Weapon Articles
- "On
Nukes, We Need to Talk," Washington Post Op-Ed
by Rose Gottemoeller, 2 April 2002
- "Pressure
for Nuclear Testing Likely on Bunker Buster, Expert Says " Global
Security Newswire, 29 March 2002
- "Nuclear
Daydreams and the Pentagon," Baltimore Sun, 28
March 2002
- "Nix
the Mini-Nukes" Christian Science Monitor Op-Ed
by Henry Kelly and Michael Levi, 28 March 2002
- "Nuclear
Security Chief Explains New Bunker Buster" Associated
Press, 19 March 2002
- "Nuclear
Arms Scientists May Lack 'Sense Of Mission'" USA
Today, 18 March 2002
- "Nuclear
Arsenal Upgrade Planned"USA Today, 18 March
2002
- "Nuclear
Warhead Study Aims at Buried Targets" Washington
Post, 15 March 2002
- "Mini-Nukes
vs. Bio-Bombs " Christian Science Monitor,
13 March 2002
- "Call
for New Breed of Nuclear Arms Faces Hurdles" New
York Times, 11 March 2002
- "United
States: DOE Requests Study on Nuclear "Bunker Busters" Global
Security Newswire, 11 February 2002
- "New
Nukes" Washington
Post, 23 April 2001
- "Scientists
Take Aim At Low-Yield Nukes" United Press International,
18 April 2001
- "Tiny
Nukes--Same Old Story?" Bulletin
of the Atomic Scientists, 25 July 2000
|